Scheduling on construction projects serves to ensure that all necessary activities for completing the work are in accordance with the requirements of the contract documents and are properly planned, staffed, coordinated and executed in an orderly and expeditious manner. Schedules assist in ensuring coordination of work and contribute to the decision-making process for owners in evaluating contractor's payment applications and proposed changes to the contract.
There is, however, a perceived risk involved with owners requiring contractors to submit schedules and then proceeding to review and accept them. The risk, of course, is that the owner accepts a schedule and agrees to something that is later used as the basis of a claim. On the flip side, the downside risk of not requiring construction schedules is that the project plan is not communicated and the owner is left with no way to effectively measure progress, check on coordination, or verify the timing of its own responsibilities required to complete the work. Without a clearly articulated scheduling specification in the contract documents, proper project scheduling may be dispensed with as a way of saving costs. However, most experienced owners recognize that the risk of not requiring comprehensive project schedules far outweighs the risk of requiring, reviewing and accepting a contractor's project schedules and the potential increased costs carried in the project's budget.
Owners should spend the time necessary during the design phase to draft a scheduling specification that is commensurate with the amount of detail, involvement and control the owner wants to see exercised on the project. Owners should also be mindful that the requirements do not become so burdensome that the schedule takes on a life of its own, becomes unmanageable and is disconnected from the contractor's actual management of the project.
Standard contracts often provide very little direction to the contractor with respect to project scheduling requirements. Elements such as specific timing, level of detail, content and formatting, among others, are often not addressed clearly, if at all. As such, adequate project schedules will very likely not be developed and the multiple benefits of creating them will not be achieved.
This session with expert speakers Kelly Heuer and Emily Federico will demonstrate the importance of a detailed project schedule specification in a construction contract and identify the key components that can be used by both parties for better project control, decision-making and, if necessary, resolution of claims.
In this program, you will learn:
Who should attend
Kelly M. Heuer
Kelly Heuer is a Managing Director in Navigant's Global Construction Practice. She has provided professional consulting services to owners, contractors, architects, sureties and their counsel on a wide variety of construction and manufacturing projects for the past 25 years. Kelly has assisted clients with dispute reso... More info
Emily Federico is an Associate Director in the Fairfield, CT office of Navigant Consulting, Inc. Ms. Federico’s experience includes the preparation and analysis of various schedule delay, acceleration, loss of productivity and cost overruns claims. Tasks performed included Critical Path Method (CPM) s... More info